← Part of our AI marking platform

Rubric marking software

Rubric marking built for educator control

Apply consistent criteria across essays, coursework and structured tasks—then review AI-drafted marks and feedback before students see anything. Build or import the rubrics your department already trusts.

  • Rubric builder & import
  • Criterion-level feedback
  • Batch cohort marking
  • Moderation-ready exports
Try live demo Get started free
The problem

Inconsistent rubric marking wastes moderation time

Rubrics exist to make grading fair and transparent, but manual rubric marking is slow—especially when every script needs criterion-by-criterion comments. Different teachers interpret bands slightly differently; moderation meetings then become long reconciliation sessions.

Rubric marking software should not flatten professional judgement. It should make the routine part of applying criteria faster, so teachers spend time on borderline decisions and teaching responses—not rewriting the same feedback phrase forty times. Rubric marking is a core capability of our AI marking platform.

Features

What matters for rubric workflows

Rubric builder

Create or upload criteria, weightings and level descriptors your team already trusts.

Criterion-level feedback

See which bands were applied and edit comments per criterion before release.

Batch cohort marking

Run one rubric against a whole class upload in a single session.

Question paper mode

Cross-reference structured Q&A papers with mark schemes.

Targeted follow-up

Generate worksheets from rubric gaps for individual learners.

Moderation exports

Evidence packs for internal QA, MAT reviews and sampling.

Builder

Design criteria once, apply them everywhere

Build rubrics in Feedback Flows or import the schemes your department already uses. Shared libraries help MATs and federations keep descriptors consistent without forcing every subject into the same mould.

Marking extended writing against those rubrics? See AI essay marking. School rollout and DPAs: AI marking for UK schools.

Rubric builder in Feedback Flows showing criteria and descriptors

Rubric builder — criteria, weightings and level descriptors.

Consistency

Moderation that starts from shared criteria

When every marker works from the same rubric library, moderation meetings focus on genuine borderline decisions rather than reconciling incompatible comment styles. AI drafts reduce the fatigue-driven drift that appears late in a marking pile; teachers still own the final band.

Most teams begin with one assignment type—mock essays, unit coursework, or a vocational portfolio—and compare AI rubric drafts to a human-marked sample set. Once moderators are satisfied, batch marking scales across cohorts.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about rubric marking

Rubric marking software applies defined criteria and descriptors to student work, producing structured grades and feedback aligned to each rubric band.

Yes. Upload or build rubrics in Feedback Flows so AI-assisted marking follows the same criteria your department or trust already uses.

Teams use rubric-aligned exports to support internal moderation, cross-school consistency in MATs, and evidence packs for quality assurance.

Create criteria, weightings and level descriptors in the builder, or import a scheme you already trust. The same rubric can then be applied to single scripts or whole cohort batches.

Yes. Question paper mode can cross-reference structured Q&A papers with mark schemes, alongside extended writing marked against multi-criterion rubrics.

Everyone marks against the same shared descriptors. AI drafts reduce the variation that comes from fatigue and rewriting the same phrases; teachers still decide borderline bands.
Get started

See rubric marking in action

Free trial credits; pay-as-you-go thereafter. No subscription required.

Try live demo Get started free
AI essay marking → AI marking overview →